🔗 Share this article

In late October 2024, the situation was utterly separate. Ahead of the American presidential vote, considerate residents could acknowledge the nation's deep flaws – its inequities and inequality – but they could still see it as America. A democratic nation. A country where the rule of law meant something. A state headed by a dignified and decent public servant, even with his elderly years and increasing frailty.

Nowadays, in late October 2025, countless Americans hardly identify the nation we inhabit. Persons suspected of being unauthorized foreigners are detained and shoved into vehicles, occasionally refused legal rights. The left side of the White House – is being destroyed to build a lavish ballroom. The president is persecuting his political rivals or supposed enemies and requesting the justice department surrender a massive sum of public funds. Soldiers with weapons are dispatched to US urban areas on false pretexts. The Pentagon, renamed the Defense Ministry, has practically liberated itself of routine media oversight as it spends potentially totaling close to a trillion USD in public funds. Universities, attorney offices, news companies are submitting from leader's menaces, and billionaires are treated like aristocracy.

“The United States, only a few months ahead of its 250^th birthday as the world’s leading democracy, has crossed the limit toward dictatorship and extremism,” Garrett Graff, wrote in August. “Ultimately, faster than I thought feasible, it occurred here.”

Every morning starts amid recent atrocities. And it is hard to comprehend – and agonizing to acknowledge – how severely declined we have become, and the rapid pace with which it occurred.

Yet, it is known that the president was properly voted in. Even after his deeply disturbing first term and even after the warnings associated with the knowledge of the rightwing blueprint – despite the president personally stated openly he intended to rule as a tyrant solely at the start – enough Americans chose him rather than his Democratic opponent.

While alarming as the present situation are, it's more frightening to realize that we have only been several months under this leadership. How will another 36 months of this deterioration find us? And if the three years turns into an prolonged era, as there is nobody to limit this leader from deciding that a third term is essential, perhaps for security concerns?

Granted, all is not lost. There will be congressional elections in 2026 which might establish an alternate balance of power, in case Democrats regain one or both houses of the legislature. We have elected officials who are striving to exert some accountability, such as representatives who are launching an investigation regarding the effort to fund seizure from the justice department.

And a national vote in the next cycle could start the path to recovery just as last year’s election set us on this unfortunate course.

We see numerous residents protesting in urban areas across municipalities, as they did last weekend at democracy demonstrations.

An ex-cabinet member, wrote recently that “the great sleeping giant of the US is awakening”, just as it did after the Communist witch-hunt era in the 1950s or throughout anti-war demonstrations or throughout the Watergate scandal.

During those times, the unstable nation eventually was righted.

Reich says he knows the signs of that revival and sees it happening currently. As support, he cites the widespread marches, the widespread, multi-faction opposition to a television host's removal and the largely united refusal by journalists to agree to the defense department’s demands they solely cover approved content.

“The slumbering entity always remains asleep until certain corruption turns extremely harmful, some action so offensive toward public welfare, specific cruelty so disruptive, that it is forced but to awaken.”

It's a positive outlook, and I value the author's seasoned opinion. Perhaps he will turn out correct.

At the same time, the crucial issues endure: can America return to normalcy? Is it possible to restore its standing internationally and its commitment to the rule of law?

Or should we recognize that the historical project worked for a while, and then – abruptly, completely – collapsed?

My negative thoughts indicates that the latter is true; that everything could be gone. My hopeful heart, though, convinces me that we must try, by any means we can.

Personally, as a media critic, that means urging journalists to live up, more thoroughly, to their mission of scrutinizing authority. For others, it could mean engaging with political races, or coordinating protests, or developing approaches to protect electoral access.

Under twelve months back, we were in a very different place. A year from now? Or after another term? The fact is, we don’t know. All we can do is to strive to not give up.

What Offers Me Encouragement Today

The engagement I encounter during teaching with aspiring reporters, that are simultaneously visionary and practical, {always